Research in Action
Business schools with research-driven missions are building buzz about their faculty's work—and promoting their intellectual brands. 

A Recipe for Collaborative Research
Mixing faculty across disciplines may be the formula for research that's more relevant and ready-made for realworld business.

Thinking Big
Author Jim Collins shares his boundless passion for business research, stressing that academic inquiry's reward isn't about answering the big questions–it's about asking them.

List of Published Journal Ranking Articles Since 1990, by Discipline

Other references:

AACSB International – The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (1987). Final report of the AACSB task force on research. St. Louis.

AACSB International – The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2003). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Tampa.

AACSB International – The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2003). Sustaining scholarship in business schools. Tampa.

AACSB International – The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2006). Overview of U.S. Business Schools. Tampa.

Bailey, J., & Ford, C. (1996). Management as science versus management as practice in postgraduate business education. Business Strategy Review, 7(4), 7-12.

Baldridge, D. C., Floyd, S. W., & Markoczy, L. (2004). Are managers from mars and academics from Venus? Toward an understanding of the relationship between academic quality and practical relevance. Strategic Management Journal, 25I, 1063-1074.

Barley, S. R., Meyer, G. W., & Gash, D. C. (1988). Cultures of Culture: Academics, practitioners and the pragmatics of normative control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 24-60.

Becker, E., Lindsay, C. M., & Grizzle, G. (2003). The derived demand for faculty research. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(8), 549. Retrieved December 18, 2006, from ProQuest.

Bedeian. A. (2004). Thoughts on the making and remaking of the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(2), 198-216.

Bennis, W. G., & O’Toole, J. (2005, May). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, I96-104.  

Bertrand, B., & Schoar, A. (2003). Managing with style. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. CXVIII, No. 4, 1169-1208.

Bloom, N., Dorgan, S., Dowdy, J., Van Reenen, J., & Rippin, T. (2005). Management Practices Across Firms and Nations. Working paper, McKinsey Global Institute.

Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered. New York: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. 

Carlile, P. R., & Christensen, C. M. (2004). The cycles of theory building in management research. Unpublished manuscript.  

David, R. J., & Strang, D. (2006). When fashion is fleeting: Transitory collective beliefs and the dynamics of TQM consulting. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 215-233.

Demski, J. S., & Zimmerman, J. L. (2000, September). On “research vs. teaching”: A long-term perspective. American Accounting Association, 14(3), 343-352.

de Rond, M., & Miller, A. N. (2005). Publish or perish bane or boon of academic life? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 321-329. Retrieved February 16, 2007, from Business Source Premier.

Diamond, R. M., & Adam, B. E. (1995). Statements on rewarding the scholarly, professional, and creative work of faculty. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.

Diamond, R. M., & Adam, B. E. (2000). The disciplines speak II: More statements on rewarding the scholarly, professional, and creative work of faculty. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education.

Dye, R. (2001). An evaluation of ‘essays on disclosure’ and the disclosure literature in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 181-235.

Ford, E. W., Duncan, W. J., Bedeian, A. G., Ginter, P. M., Rousculp, M. D., & Adams, A. M. (2005). Mitigating risks, visible hands, inevitable disasters, and soft variables: Management research that matters to managers. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4), 24-38.

Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75-91.

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The production of knowledge. London: Sage.

Gordon, R. A., & Howell, J. E. (1959). Higher education for business. New York: Columbia University Press.

Hodgkinson, G. P., Herriot, P., Anderson, N. (2001). Realigning the stakeholders in management research: Lessons from industrial, work and organizational psychology. Journal of Management, 12, S41-S48.

Holden, G., Rosenberg, G., & Barker, K. (2005). Bibiometrics: A potential decision making aid in hiring, reappointment, tenure and promotion decsions. Social Work in Health Care, 41(3/4), 67-92.

Hopwood, A. G. (2002). ‘If only there were simple solutions, but there aren’t’: Some reflections on Zimmerman’s critique of empirical management accounting research. The European Accounting Review, 11(4), 777-785. 

InnoCreative, Inc. (2002). About InnoCentive. Retrieved July 13, 2006, from http://www.innocentive.com/about/index.html. 

Institute for Competitiveness and Prosperity (2006). Rebalancing priorities for Canada’s prosperity. Toronto: Author.

Knights, D., & Willmott, H. (1997). The hype and hope of interdisciplinary management studies. British Journal of Management, 8, 9-22.

London, S. (2003, June). When is a magazine not a magazine? When its HBR: Management: The Harvard Business Review is proud of its intellectual pedigree. Financial Times, p. 13.

March, J. G., & Reed, J. S. (2000). Citigroup’s John Reed and Stanford’s James March on management research and practice. Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 52-64.

Marketing Science Institute. (2006). Overview of the MSI research program. Retrieved July 13, 2006, from http://www.msi.org/msi/research.cfm.

Peritz, B. C. (1992). On the objectives of citation analysis: Problems of theory and method. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(6), 448-451.

Pettigrew, A. M. (2001). Management research after modernism. British Journal of Management, 12, S61-S70.

Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1), 78-95.

Pierson, R. C. (1959). The education of American businessmen. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Porter, L. W., & McKibbin, L. E. (1988). Management education and development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., & Daft, R. L. (2001). Across the great divide: Knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 340-355.

Seybolt, J. W. (1996). The case against practicality and relevance as gauges of business schools. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(4), 355-358. Retrieved February 16, 2007, from Business Source Premier.

Shao, L. P., Anderson, L., LeClair, D., & Shao, S. (2007). Comparative analysis of scholarly performance. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Starkey, K., & Madan, P. (2001). Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British Journal of Management, 12, S3-S26.  

UK Department of Trade and Industry (2002). Government response to the report of the Council for Excellence and Management in Leadership. London: Author.

U.S. Academies. (2006). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington D.C.: Joseph Henry Press. 

Van de Ven, A., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802-821.

Whitley, R. (1984). The fragmented state of management studies: Reasons and consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 21(3), 331-348.