myAACSB   > Home   > About Us   > Newsroom   > Contact Us

MEMBER SERVICES
ACCREDITATION
CONFERENCES & SEMINARS
PUBLICATIONS
KNOWLEDGE SERVICES
RESOURCE CENTERS
BIZSCHOOLJOBS
The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business
AACSB International
Print Friendly Version

Assessment Home
About
Overview
FAQs
Accreditation Standards
Practices
Past Voices
Symposium Handouts
Tools
Interviews
Reading Lists
Links
Community
Contact

Contributing Sponsor:



Overview of Assessment

The Assessment Process

1. Define Learning Goals and Objectives

    

The necessary first step in developing an assessment program is to define learning goals and objectives.  The process needs to start with the goals, not the methods! 

Learning goals are the general educational aims of the program – the broad outcomes that are expected.  Thus, they should flow from the program’s mission.   In articulating learning goals, faculty are answering the question – what will our students learn?   Goals  can focus on content, skills, or attitudes.  AACSB requires goals to be defined for each program and to incorporate student mastery of general knowledge, skills (e.g., communication abilities, critical thinking), and management-specific topics (e.g., change management, ethics and social responsibility). 

There should be four to ten learning goals developed for each program in the business school.  Active faculty involvement in defining learning goals is critical and expected.  Other constituencies who can meaningfully contribute to the discussion include representatives from the business community, alumni, students, and faculty from outside the business school. 

Useful questions to pose to begin the discussion on learning goals include:

  • What do we value?
  • How would we identify a successful graduate?
  • What are the skills, knowledge, experiences, and values that are at the center of our program’s curriculum?
  • What should a graduate from this program be able to know and do?

Defining learning goals is a thought-provoking, time-consuming, sometimes acrimonious exercise; this task needs careful attention.  These goals will drive not only assessment, but the whole curriculum management process.  For accreditation or maintenance purposes, meetings and other forms of discussion (e.g., an online discussion board) on this topic on this topic must be documented. 

Here is an example of the learning goals articulated by the School of Business faculty at Montclair State University (Upper Montclair. NJ):

Montclair State University 
The School of Business Strategic Charter 

(includes Mission, Stakeholders, Vision & Strategies)

 To prepare our students for the roles we have described in Our Mission, we must assure their mastery of: 

  • Discipline-specific Knowledge & Competencies
  • Thinking Skills
  • Communication Skills
  • Change Management
  • Self Development

(To see how each learning goal is translated into observable student behaviors, follow this link:  http://www.montclair.edu/pages/business/Philosophy.html#top)

When developing goals, it is wise to consider a range of cognitive skills. Program learning goals should go beyond simple knowledge recall, to include more complex cognitive skills such as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.  Bloom's classification of cognitive skills is a useful tool to refer to in order to ensure that learning goals are varied, comprehensive,  and appropriately ambitious for program review. 

The next step is to translate these general education aims (goals) into objectives

The main difference between goals and objectives is the level of specificity.  Objectives are short but clear statements about the specific outcomes we expect from students.  For assessment to be effective, objectives must be clearly articulated before deciding upon methods and measures.  Objectives should specify the behavior that will serve as evidence that the learning goal has been achieved. 

Example: 

Learning Goal:  Our students will be effective communicators 

Objective:  Our graduates will be able to prepare and deliver a persuasive, professional speech on a current topic in their discipline. 

A second example of a clearly stated objective related to critical thinking and quantitative reasoning from St. Cloud State University: 

Objective:  The student will design, conduct, and statistically analyze data to solve problems encountered by human resources professionals.  The student will substantiate conclusions and implications generated by such research (see St. Cloud State Guidelines for Program Assessment).

This objective states the expectation, and indicates the student behavior that will be observed in order to determine whether this expectation is met.

The Assessment Office at Ball State University provides this advice for their faculty regarding written objectives:

The Objective …

  • Uses action verbs that specify definite, observable behaviors.
  • Uses simple language
  • Describes student rather than teacher behaviors
  • Describes a learning outcome rather than a learning process.
  • Focuses on end-of-instruction behavior rather than subject matter coverage
  • Indicates a single outcome per objective
  • Uses one or more measure for each objective
  • Is clearly linked to a goal
  • Is realistic and attainable
  • Is clear to people outside the discipline
  • Is validated by departmental colleagues.

Source:  http://www.bsu.edu/web/assessment (Go to Resources, Assessment Workbook, Chapter 2)

 

 


777 South Harbour Island Boulevard, Suite 750
Tampa, FL 33602-5730 USA
Tel: 813-769-6500 Fax: 813-769-6559